The Australian Government is now operating in line with Caretaker Conventions, pending the outcome of the 2025 federal election.
The 2022–23 STEM Influencer Survey by YouthInsight explored parents’ perceptions and attitudes to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics).
Compare STEM interest and perceptions among parents across demographic groups, including how often they talk with their kids about STEM.
Source: YouthInsight 2022–23
The coloured bars show the proportion of parents who agreed with each statement about STEM.
The diamonds show the proportion of parents in the chosen demographics who agreed.
For example, this image shows:
The survey found parents’ own employment and education circumstances correlated strongly with their views on STEM and their children’s study and careers.
A significantly larger proportion of fathers reported having higher education qualifications compared to mothers (66% of fathers, 57% of mothers). This gap was even greater when focusing on STEM. Among tertiary-qualified parents, fathers were more than twice as likely to have a STEM qualification as mothers (45% of fathers, 20% of mothers). These significant differences were also present in the previous 2020-21 STEM influencer survey.
Most parents (90%) agreed that a STEM-skilled workforce is important for the Australian economy. While this was slightly less than the previous STEM influencer survey (2020–21) with a 92% agreement, the difference was not significant.
Between the two survey waves, a lower proportion of parents agreed that their child needed the following skills to get a good job in future:
The proportion of parents who thought technology skills were important for future employment did not change significantly (87% in 2022–23, down from 89% in 2020–21).
A higher proportion of fathers than mothers agreed that STEM skills are important to get a good job. However, for mathematics skills, mothers and fathers were equal, with 83% in each group agreeing maths skills are important for their child to get a good job in future.
Parents of boys (meaning the eldest child is a boy) were significantly more likely than parents of girls (meaning the eldest child is a girl) to believe that engineering skills are important (76% for parents of boys compared to 67% for parents of girls).
Parents in metropolitan areas were more likely to view science and engineering as important (science 78%, engineering 74%), compared to parents in regional or remote areas (science 72%, engineering 67%).
Parents with a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background were more likely to view all STEM skills as important compared to non-CALD parents.
The importance of technology skills for future employment did not decrease significantly since the last survey, while all other STEM skills did. This may be because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2022–23 parents were asked, for the first time, if COVID-19 influenced how likely they would be to encourage their child to study or work in each STEM area. Technology had the highest likelihood, with 51% of parents saying COVID-19 made them more likely to encourage their child to study or work in technology. Other STEM areas had a 41% likelihood or lower.
80% of parents said they had a general interest in STEM, with technology (81%) and science (77%) the most popular subjects. This is slightly higher than in 2020–21, however these changes are not statistically significant.
Interest levels were significantly higher among fathers than mothers across all STEM subjects. Close to a third of all parents had low or no interest in mathematics (35%) or engineering (32%).
Parents of boys showed higher levels of interest in engineering (70%, compared to 66% of parents of girls) and mathematics (67%, compared to 63% of parents of girls). These results are similar to the 2020-21 survey.
General interest in STEM was also significantly higher among parents from:
Almost half of all parents (47%) reported having at least weekly discussions with their children about STEM topics. 11% of parents did not discuss STEM with their children at all –this is a significant decrease from 15% in 2020–21, suggesting higher engagement with STEM.
There were no significant differences in weekly conversations about STEM topics among fathers compared to mothers, or parents of boys compared to parents of girls. However, there have been changes among these groups since the last survey. Weekly conversations have significantly increased for mothers (46%, up from 38% in 2020–21) and parents of girls (48%, up from 42%). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences for fathers (48%, down from 51%) or parents of boys (46%, down from 47%).
Families held STEM conversations significantly more frequently when at least one parent had a STEM qualification themselves (56% had weekly conversations), compared to those without a STEM qualification (44% had weekly conversations).
More than three-quarters (78%) of parents reported having medium to high confidence in their ability to support their children with STEM. A significantly higher proportion of fathers (86%) reported confidence in supporting their children with STEM schoolwork compared to mothers (70%).
More parents reported medium or high confidence with technology (77%), science (74%) and mathematics (71%), than engineering (63%). Parents were least confident in engineering, with 37% reporting low or no confidence in this area.
Confidence in STEM in general was significantly higher among parents from:
Compare gender perceptions among parents across demographic groups. Explore parent views on how engaged girls and boys are in STEM subjects and parent perceptions on how suited they are to STEM careers.
The survey asked parents about the ease of engaging girls and boys in STEM.
The survey asked parents whether boys or girls have a better chance to succeed in STEM.
Some groups of parents were more likely to believe in girls’ or boys’ STEM engagement, suitability, or career success:
Despite this, more than half of all parents did not believe gender plays any role in a successful STEM career:
The data showed a correlation between parents’ perceptions of the suitability of different jobs to different genders, and the perceived importance of STEM skills to those jobs. Parents thought:
These results were consistent with the STEM influencer teacher and career advisor survey.
Some groups of parents had more gendered views of jobs and STEM skills than others. The following groups of parents did not think that any jobs where STEM skills are essential were more suited to girls:
The 2022–23 STEM influencer parents survey was a survey of 1,500 parents. The survey asked questions designed to understand how parents contribute to young people’s perceptions and attitudes to STEM. Respondents came from all states and territories across Australia.
To ensure survey results represented the population, weighting corrected for under- or over-representation of sub-groups by gender and state or territory.
Our department commissioned YouthInsight to carry out this survey as part of the Youth in STEM research project. In 2022–23, they also surveyed teachers and career advisers to complement the parent survey. They will conduct the Youth in STEM survey again in 2023–24.
Refer to the STEM influencer parent survey 2022–23 report for more detailed information and project methodology.
Read the STEM influencer parent survey 2020–21 report.
Read about our methodology.
